TATA project at Singur may be moved to a new place if a settlement is not reached soon. This was a very ambitious project nationally and internationally. Mukesh Ambani also spoke supported the TATA’s
This post was written by:
Kishore Asokan.About Kishore - I have been working on different online projects for some time now. Making money online is my biggest challenge and to some extend I have succeeded. Visit Kishore Asokan's website to find out more.. Read other articles writtern by Asokan Kishore
Kishore On Digg | Kishore On Twitter | Kishore On Facebook | Kishore On Stumbleupon
Wordpress Plugin For PAP
I want to register my following queries to the so-called supporter of TATA and NANO plant (mostly commies intellectuals):
· Who is responsible for this fiasco?
- Definitely TATAs and WB Govt. Why TATA has chosen the fertile lands of Singur and not some barren lands of Birbhum or Bankura? Why WB Govt. try to bulldoze the land acquisition without taking the farmers and the opposition into confidence? Why the agreement between TATA and Govt. is still not published and kept secret? Why 1897 land acquisition law (which is meant for some Govt. project of public importance) was applied to acquire lands for private industry? CPI(M) has now become a party of promoters and real estate agent in WB. They think that their party workers can earn more if they bring big industries at any cost to Bengal because that will inflate the real estate market. So CPI(M) is now after industrialization even at the cost of poor farmers. We want answers on all these from the supporter of TATA plant before criticizing the agitation.
· Why the situation is different from other states?
- The scnerio in WB is different than other states because firstly the lands are much more fertile than the barren lands used for industry in other states like Maharashtra. Secondly people are very poor and depend solely on small pieces of land as their sole means of livelihood. If the land is taken away with whatever compensation, the whole family will lose their earning and they will become labourer. So to create employment of about 10000 people in Nano plant (mostly out of state engineers and labourers and a few Bengali as clerk) actually we will create 10000 unemployed (land owner and their family members). This is not development. Who will benefit from the Nano car? The middle class, who have power to purchase a car and not the Farmers.
· What if TATA agrees to return 400 acre of land?
- Some logic is given that if the land is returned that is not cultivable now because it has lost its fertility. But presnt land rate of Singur is 45 lakh per acre whereas the Govt rate is 12 lakh per acre. The farmers even cannot do cultivation can sell the land at higher price for real estate and be benefited.
· What if TATA leave Singur?
- TATA chosen Singur and WB not out of any affection to Bengal or for its development. They have calculated that since WB is one of the cheapest parts of India and since it is near to their steel plant at Jamshedpur, they can save a lot of money to produce the car and can sell that at cheapest price. This is not possible in Maharashtra or Gujarat where the cost of living is very high which will escalate the car price. So I don’t think they will leave WB. If they do so, only part of investment of 1500 crore will be lost which was used for land filling, labour cost etc. Other things like structures, machineries can be dismantled and taken to new site and reused. So total loss of TATA will be only 150-200 crore out of 1500 crore.
- To make comments on the question raised from some quarter about the cost of Rs. 2.5 lakh per day to continue this dharna and the source of that money. Why not this question of source of money is not raised when MPs are bought openly to win trust vote, or when national parties do their convention, hiring stadium and offer free foods to thousands of their supporters? Why this is raised only for Trinamul? The allegation that this agitation will harm image of India, may I ask the image of India is not harmed when MPs show money in parliament or Christian missionaries are killed in Orissa or innocent Muslims are butchered in Gujarat? Only image is hurt when poor farmers agitate to get their land back?